CandiMentor
Quick Links

Statutory Audit Interview Q&A

InterviewQ&A

This section offers a curated set of interview questions, with insights into what interviewers are assessing, key elements to include in your responses, and CandiMentor’s suggested sample answers to help you prepare with confidence.

A. Audit Planning, Risk Assessment & Independence

Q1: During audit planning, how do you determine materiality and its impact on your procedures?

What the interviewer tests: Understanding of audit planning and materiality concepts.

Key elements:
  • Definition of materiality
  • Factors influencing materiality
  • Impact on audit procedures

Materiality is determined by assessing the size and nature of potential misstatements that could influence the economic decisions of users. Factors such as company size, industry standards, and financial stability are considered. Materiality impacts audit procedures by focusing efforts on areas with higher risk of material misstatement, ensuring efficient and effective auditing.

Q2: How do you respond if you detect possible fraud or suspicious transactions while planning the audit?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your ability to handle ethical issues and your knowledge of audit procedures.

Key elements:
  • Ethical awareness
  • Audit protocol
  • Communication skills

If I detect possible fraud or suspicious transactions during audit planning, I would first gather sufficient evidence to support my findings. Then, I would escalate the issue to my audit manager or partner, adhering to the firm's policies. It is crucial to maintain confidentiality and document all findings thoroughly to ensure proper handling of the situation.

Q3: How do you ensure independence and objectivity, especially when faced with management pressure or prior relationships?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your ethical standards and ability to maintain professional integrity.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of independence and objectivity
  • Handling management pressure
  • Managing prior relationships

To ensure independence and objectivity, I adhere strictly to professional guidelines and ethical standards. I maintain a clear separation between personal relationships and professional responsibilities, and I always communicate openly with management about potential conflicts of interest. If faced with pressure, I focus on facts and data to support my conclusions, ensuring that my work remains unbiased.

Q4: Describe your process for risk assessment. Can you share a situation where you identified a material risk others overlooked?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your ability to assess risks, your attention to detail, and your problem-solving skills.

Key elements:
  • Risk assessment process
  • Attention to detail
  • Problem-solving example

My risk assessment process involves identifying potential risks, evaluating their impact and likelihood, and developing mitigation strategies. In a previous role, I identified a material risk in a client's supply chain that others had overlooked, which could have disrupted production. By addressing it early, we avoided significant delays and costs.

Q5: Walk me through your approach to planning a statutory audit—from client onboarding to final reporting. What key stages and risks do you consider?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your knowledge of the audit process, including risk management and reporting.

Key elements:
  • Client onboarding
  • Risk assessment
  • Final reporting

My approach to a statutory audit begins with client onboarding, where I gather preliminary information and understand their business environment. The next key stage is risk assessment, where I identify potential areas of material misstatement and plan audit procedures accordingly. Throughout the audit, I maintain clear communication with the client to address any issues promptly. Finally, in the reporting stage, I prepare the audit report, ensuring it reflects the findings accurately and provides value to stakeholders by highlighting key insights and recommendations.

Q6: If you’re assigned an audit where the previous auditor resigned due to management non-cooperation, what steps do you take before accepting the engagement?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your risk assessment skills and understanding of professional ethics.

Key elements:
  • Risk assessment
  • Understanding management issues
  • Professional ethics

Before accepting the engagement, I would first conduct a thorough risk assessment to understand the reasons behind the previous auditor's resignation. This includes meeting with management to discuss their willingness to cooperate and reviewing any available documentation. I would also consult with the audit committee and legal counsel to ensure there are no ethical conflicts or unresolved issues that could impede the audit process.

B. Internal Controls & IT Systems

Q7: How do you assess and test internal controls during a statutory audit? Can you give an example of when weak controls changed your audit approach?

What the interviewer tests: Ability to evaluate and respond to internal controls in an audit context.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of internal controls
  • Audit approach adaptation
  • Real-life example

To assess and test internal controls, I start by understanding the client's control environment through walkthroughs and discussions with management. I then perform tests of controls to evaluate their effectiveness. For example, during an audit, I discovered that a client had weak segregation of duties in their cash handling process. This finding led me to increase the extent of substantive testing in that area to mitigate the risk of material misstatement.

Q8: Suppose there’s a major IT system change mid-year. Management says controls are unaffected. How will you independently verify this?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your ability to independently evaluate IT controls and ensure system integrity post-implementation.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of IT controls
  • Ability to verify independently
  • Knowledge of audit procedures

To verify that controls are unaffected, I would first review the system change documentation and identify critical controls. Then, I would perform a walkthrough of the affected processes, conduct testing of key controls, and compare pre- and post-change control environments. Engaging with IT and internal audit teams would also help ensure comprehensive validation.

Q9: Describe a situation where you uncovered a control weakness. How did you address it with management and in your audit report?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is evaluating your ability to identify control weaknesses and effectively communicate and address them.

Key elements:
  • Identification of weakness
  • Communication with management
  • Reporting and resolution

While auditing the accounts payable process, I discovered a control weakness related to inadequate segregation of duties. I immediately communicated this finding to management, highlighting the potential risk of fraud. In my audit report, I recommended implementing automated approval workflows to strengthen controls. Management appreciated the proactive approach and swiftly adopted the recommendations, enhancing the overall control environment.

Q10: How do you evaluate the effectiveness of IT controls? What audit tools or procedures do you use for IT environments?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your knowledge of IT audit processes and your ability to ensure robust IT controls.

Key elements:
  • Knowledge of IT controls
  • Audit tools proficiency
  • Risk assessment

To evaluate the effectiveness of IT controls, I begin with a risk assessment to identify critical areas. I use audit tools such as ACL or IDEA for data analysis and conduct walkthroughs and tests of controls to ensure compliance with policies. I also review access controls, data integrity, and change management processes to ensure they align with industry standards.

C. Fraud, Error & Professional Skepticism

Q11: Suppose you receive a whistleblower complaint about inventory fraud. What’s your investigative process as an auditor?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your investigative skills, understanding of audit procedures, and ability to handle sensitive situations.

Key elements:
  • Initial assessment
  • Gathering evidence
  • Interviewing involved parties

Upon receiving a whistleblower complaint, my first step would be to assess the credibility of the information. I would then gather relevant documentation and evidence related to the inventory records. Next, I would conduct interviews with key personnel involved in inventory management. Throughout the process, maintaining confidentiality and objectivity is crucial to ensure a thorough investigation.

Q12: What steps would you take if you suspect management override through unusual journal entries?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your ability to identify and address potential financial irregularities and fraud.

Key elements:
  • Identify unusual entries
  • Investigate further
  • Implement controls

If I suspect management override, I would first review the unusual journal entries for patterns or inconsistencies. Next, I would investigate further by consulting with other team members and reviewing supporting documentation. Finally, I would recommend implementing or strengthening internal controls to prevent future occurrences.

Q13: After issuing your audit report, you learn of a material fraud that occurred before the balance sheet date. What are your responsibilities?

What the interviewer tests: Understanding of post-audit responsibilities and ethical standards.

Key elements:
  • Professional responsibility
  • Ethical standards
  • Communication

Upon learning of the material fraud, my responsibility is to assess the impact on the audit report. I would discuss the findings with management and the audit committee, and consider if the report needs to be withdrawn or revised. It's crucial to document the process and ensure all stakeholders are informed promptly to maintain integrity and compliance with auditing standards.

Q14: How do you maintain professional skepticism during audit, especially with persuasive management?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your ability to remain objective and critical in auditing situations, particularly when faced with influential management.

Key elements:
  • Objectivity
  • Critical thinking
  • Handling pressure from management

To maintain professional skepticism, I prioritize evidence-based auditing by thoroughly examining supporting documents and questioning inconsistencies. I also stay informed about industry trends and maintain open communication with my team to cross-verify findings, ensuring my conclusions are independent of management's influence.

D. Substantive Procedures & Audit Evidence

Q15: You find a large number of post-dated cheques in the cash book. What audit considerations arise, and how would you handle them?

What the interviewer tests: Ability to assess audit risks and implications of post-dated cheques.

Key elements:
  • Audit implications
  • Risk assessment
  • Handling approach

The presence of a large number of post-dated cheques could indicate potential liquidity issues or attempts to manipulate financial statements. I would assess the impact on cash flow and verify whether these cheques are recorded in the correct accounting period. I would also evaluate the rationale behind issuing post-dated cheques and review related internal controls to ensure they prevent misstatement. Additionally, I would discuss with management the reasons for this practice and document my findings in the audit report.

Q16: How do you design substantive audit procedures and select samples? Give an example involving a high-risk account.

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your understanding of audit procedures and risk management.

Key elements:
  • Risk assessment
  • Procedure design
  • Sample selection

To design substantive audit procedures, I start by assessing the risk level of the account, focusing on materiality and nature of transactions. For high-risk accounts, I develop detailed procedures like transaction testing and analytical reviews. For example, when auditing a high-risk revenue account, I select samples based on stratified sampling to ensure coverage of significant transactions and verify them against supporting documents for accuracy.

Q17: Explain the procedure for sending external confirmations to debtors and creditors. What would you do if you receive several negative or no responses?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of external confirmations and your ability to handle discrepancies.

Key elements:
  • External confirmation process
  • Handling negative responses
  • Communication with debtors and creditors

The procedure involves preparing confirmation requests, sending them to debtors or creditors, and ensuring follow-up. If I receive negative or no responses, I would verify the details internally, reach out to the parties for clarification, and document any discrepancies or resolutions.

Q18: During a stock count, you observe that physical inventory does not match the books, and management provides only ad hoc explanations. How do you proceed?

What the interviewer tests: Problem-solving skills and ability to handle discrepancies.

Key elements:
  • Investigate discrepancy
  • Verify documentation
  • Engage management

I would start by conducting a detailed investigation to identify any potential reasons for the discrepancy. This would involve verifying all inventory records, reviewing recent transactions, and checking for any recording errors. I would also engage with management to understand their explanations and seek additional documentation to support their claims. If necessary, I would recommend implementing stronger controls to prevent future discrepancies.

Q19: While reviewing board minutes, you find off-balance sheet arrangements. How do you ensure all material items are captured in the accounts?

What the interviewer tests: Understanding of accounting principles and attention to detail in financial reporting.

Key elements:
  • Review of board minutes
  • Identification of off-balance sheet items
  • Ensuring comprehensive financial reporting

To ensure all material items are captured, I would first conduct a thorough review of the board minutes to identify any off-balance sheet arrangements. I would then cross-reference these findings with existing financial statements and consult with relevant departments to gather additional documentation. Finally, I would ensure the appropriate disclosures and adjustments are made in the accounts to reflect these items accurately.

E. Revenue, Receivables, and Related Party Transactions

Q20: What are your audit procedures for revenue recognition under Ind AS 115/AS 9? Can you share a tricky situation you’ve handled?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your technical knowledge of revenue recognition standards and your ability to apply them in practice.

Key elements:
  • Knowledge of Ind AS 115/AS 9
  • Application of standards
  • Problem-solving in complex scenarios

For auditing revenue recognition under Ind AS 115/AS 9, I begin by understanding the client's revenue streams and identifying performance obligations. I then assess the transaction price and its allocation to each obligation. I also verify the timing of revenue recognition, ensuring it aligns with the transfer of control. A tricky situation I handled involved a client with bundled contracts, where I had to carefully evaluate each component to ensure accurate revenue allocation. I collaborated with the client to gather necessary documentation and applied professional judgment to resolve the issue.

Q22: The company’s trade receivables have jumped sharply, and management blames “aggressive credit sales.” What steps do you take to check existence and recoverability?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of audit procedures for trade receivables and your approach to assessing credit risk.

Key elements:
  • Audit procedures
  • Credit risk assessment
  • Verification of receivables

To check the existence and recoverability of trade receivables, I would first review the aging report to identify overdue accounts. Next, I would perform confirmations with a sample of customers to verify balances. I would also assess the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing past collection patterns and current economic conditions. Finally, I would discuss with management their credit policies and any changes made recently.

Q23: You notice significant, unexplained revenue fluctuations each quarter, but management attributes it to seasonality. How do you validate their explanation?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your analytical skills and ability to verify management's claims.

Key elements:
  • Data analysis
  • Industry comparison
  • Historical trends

To validate management's explanation, I would analyze historical revenue data to identify patterns consistent with seasonality. I would also compare these trends to industry benchmarks to ensure alignment. Finally, I would review any external factors, such as market changes or economic conditions, that might explain the fluctuations.

F. Liabilities, Provisions, and Statutory Dues

Q28: The company has large advances to suppliers outstanding for over two years. How do you evaluate their validity?

What the interviewer tests: Ability to assess financial records and identify potential issues in supplier transactions.

Key elements:
  • Aging analysis
  • Supplier contracts
  • Reconciliation

To evaluate the validity of large advances to suppliers outstanding for over two years, I would perform an aging analysis to determine how long these advances have been outstanding. Reviewing supplier contracts and agreements would help verify the terms and conditions under which the advances were made. Additionally, I would reconcile these advances with supplier statements and correspondence to ensure they are legitimate and determine if any follow-up actions are necessary.

Q29: If you find statutory dues records incomplete and management unable to reconcile them, what audit steps will you follow?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your problem-solving skills and understanding of audit procedures in complex situations.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of statutory dues
  • Audit procedures
  • Problem-solving under uncertainty

In such a situation, I would first perform a preliminary analysis to understand the extent of the discrepancies. Next, I would engage with the management to gather any available supporting documents. I would then cross-verify these with third-party confirmations or external records where possible. Finally, I would document my findings and recommend corrective actions to ensure future compliance.

Q30: During your audit, you find a significant unrecorded liability just before signing the audit report. What immediate actions do you take?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is evaluating your problem-solving skills, attention to detail, and adherence to audit standards.

Key elements:
  • Identify and assess the liability
  • Communicate with management
  • Adjust the audit report if necessary

Upon discovering a significant unrecorded liability, my first step would be to gather all relevant information to assess its impact on the financial statements. I would then immediately inform the audit team and senior management to discuss the implications. If necessary, I would propose adjustments to the financial statements and ensure that the audit report reflects the updated information, maintaining transparency and compliance with auditing standards.

Q31: What are the main challenges in auditing provisions and contingent liabilities? Share a practical example.

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of auditing complexities and your ability to provide practical insights.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of provisions and contingent liabilities
  • Identification of auditing challenges
  • Ability to provide practical examples

Auditing provisions and contingent liabilities is challenging due to their inherent uncertainty and the need for significant judgment in estimating amounts. For example, auditing a company's legal provision requires assessing the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and estimating potential financial impacts. This involves reviewing legal opinions, management's assumptions, and historical data to ensure accurate representation in financial statements.

Q32: What's your process for checking compliance with TDS, GST, and other statutory dues?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your understanding of statutory compliance and your ability to implement processes to ensure adherence.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of statutory regulations
  • Process implementation
  • Attention to detail

To ensure compliance with TDS, GST, and other statutory dues, I start by maintaining an updated calendar of due dates and requirements. I regularly review government notifications for any changes in regulations. I perform monthly reconciliations of tax liabilities and payments, ensuring accurate and timely filings. Additionally, I conduct periodic audits to verify compliance and address any discrepancies immediately.

Q33: How do you audit for compliance with CARO requirements regarding statutory liabilities?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of CARO requirements and your ability to conduct compliance audits.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of CARO requirements
  • Audit procedures for statutory liabilities
  • Attention to compliance

To audit for compliance with CARO requirements regarding statutory liabilities, I first review the company's records for any statutory dues. I then verify whether these dues have been paid within the prescribed time limits and cross-check this information with bank statements. Additionally, I assess the adequacy of the company's internal controls in managing these liabilities and ensure that any discrepancies are reported in the audit findings.

G. Assets (Fixed, Investments, Inventory)

Q34: Describe your approach to auditing investments in shares, debentures, and securities.

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of auditing processes for financial instruments and your ability to ensure compliance and accuracy.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of financial instruments
  • Compliance with regulations
  • Accuracy and thoroughness in auditing

My approach involves first understanding the client’s investment portfolio and the relevant accounting standards. I would then assess the valuation methods used, verify ownership and existence through confirmations, and review the compliance with regulatory requirements. Finally, I would evaluate the internal controls related to investments to ensure accurate reporting.

Q35: While auditing, you suspect fixed assets have been overvalued through inflated invoices. How do you investigate this?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your auditing skills, attention to detail, and ability to detect financial discrepancies.

Key elements:
  • Examination of invoices
  • Cross-verification with suppliers
  • Analysis of asset valuation methods

I would begin by reviewing the invoices in question, checking for irregularities such as missing information or unusual pricing. Next, I would cross-verify the invoice details with the suppliers to confirm their authenticity and ensure the prices align with market rates. Additionally, I would analyze the asset valuation methods used to ensure they comply with accounting standards and are not artificially inflating asset values.

Q36: Explain the procedures for verifying existence and valuation of fixed assets during a statutory audit.

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of audit procedures and asset verification.

Key elements:
  • Physical verification
  • Documentation review
  • Valuation methods

To verify the existence and valuation of fixed assets during a statutory audit, I start with physical verification to confirm the assets are present and in use. Next, I review supporting documentation like invoices, title deeds, and maintenance records to ensure ownership and condition. Finally, I assess the valuation methods used, such as cost or revaluation model, to ensure compliance with relevant accounting standards.

Q37: How do you audit inventory—including stock counts, valuation, and cut-off procedures?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of inventory auditing procedures and your ability to ensure accuracy and compliance.

Key elements:
  • Stock counts
  • Valuation methods
  • Cut-off procedures

To audit inventory, I start with planning and understanding the client's inventory system. I perform stock counts by observing physical counts and reconciling them with records. For valuation, I ensure the method used (FIFO, LIFO, etc.) is appropriate and consistently applied. Cut-off procedures are verified by reviewing transactions around the year-end to ensure they are recorded in the correct period. This comprehensive approach helps ensure inventory accuracy and compliance with accounting standards.

Q38: How do you distinguish between capital and revenue expenditure during audit of asset purchases?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of financial accounting principles and your ability to apply them in an audit context.

Key elements:
  • Definition and characteristics of capital expenditure
  • Definition and characteristics of revenue expenditure
  • Impact on financial statements

Capital expenditure is incurred to acquire or improve long-term assets and is capitalized on the balance sheet, affecting depreciation. Revenue expenditure is for day-to-day operations, recorded in the income statement, impacting profit. During audits, I assess the nature, purpose, and timing of each expense to ensure accurate classification.

H. Group Audits, Consolidations & Special Areas

Q39: How do you approach audit of significant year-end transactions between group companies with limited documentation?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your ability to handle complex audit scenarios and your problem-solving skills.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of audit processes
  • Problem-solving approach
  • Communication and collaboration

In auditing significant year-end transactions with limited documentation, I start by assessing the overall risk and understanding the business rationale behind the transactions. I then gather available documentation and corroborate it with independent sources, such as bank statements or confirmations. I also ensure that I communicate with management to understand the context and obtain any missing information. Lastly, I document my findings and discuss them with my team to ensure a comprehensive audit approach.

Q40: You’re auditing a company with foreign subsidiaries. If a foreign auditor reports a material misstatement, but management wants a clean opinion, what do you do?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your ethical judgment and ability to handle conflicts of interest.

Key elements:
  • Ethical decision-making
  • Handling audit discrepancies
  • Communication with management

If faced with a material misstatement reported by a foreign auditor, I would first assess the validity and impact of the findings. I would discuss the implications with management, emphasizing the importance of transparency and compliance with auditing standards. If management insists on a clean opinion despite the findings, I would document the disagreement and consider issuing a qualified opinion to maintain professional integrity.

Q41: Explain the special considerations when auditing listed companies versus unlisted ones.

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your understanding of the regulatory and procedural differences in auditing listed versus unlisted companies.

Key elements:
  • Regulatory requirements
  • Public interest
  • Disclosure obligations

Auditing listed companies involves stricter regulatory requirements due to the involvement of public investors. These companies must adhere to additional disclosure obligations and are subject to closer scrutiny by regulatory bodies. In contrast, unlisted companies typically have fewer disclosure requirements, but auditors still need to ensure compliance with relevant accounting standards.

Q42: What steps do you take for auditing group companies and consolidated financial statements?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer wants to evaluate your understanding of auditing processes and your ability to handle complex financial structures.

Key elements:
  • Understanding group structure
  • Intercompany transaction review
  • Consolidation adjustments

I start by understanding the group structure and identifying significant entities. Next, I conduct a risk assessment and review intercompany transactions for accuracy. Finally, I focus on consolidation adjustments to ensure compliance with accounting standards and eliminate any intra-group balances.

I. Audit Reporting, Compliance & Communication

Q43: How do you check compliance with Schedule III of Companies Act and SEBI/other regulatory requirements?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your knowledge of compliance procedures and your ability to ensure adherence to regulatory requirements.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of regulations
  • Compliance checks
  • Documentation and reporting

To ensure compliance with Schedule III of the Companies Act and SEBI regulations, I regularly review financial statements to verify adherence to prescribed formats and disclosure requirements. I conduct compliance checks against a checklist of regulatory requirements and maintain thorough documentation of all compliance activities. Additionally, I stay updated on any changes in regulations to ensure ongoing compliance.

Q44: What are your procedures for documenting audit work as per SA 230?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is testing your knowledge of auditing standards and your ability to effectively document audit work.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of SA 230
  • Documentation procedures
  • Importance of audit documentation

As per SA 230, I ensure that audit documentation is comprehensive and clear, capturing the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures performed. I maintain a detailed record of audit evidence obtained and conclusions reached, which facilitates supervision, review, and future audits. This documentation supports the audit opinion and complies with legal and professional standards.

Q45: What is your process for reporting to those charged with governance or the audit committee, especially when issues arise?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your communication skills, integrity, and ability to handle sensitive situations.

Key elements:
  • Clear communication
  • Transparency
  • Timeliness

My process involves promptly identifying the issue and gathering all relevant facts. I ensure transparency by clearly communicating the issue's impact and potential solutions to the audit committee. I prioritize timely updates to keep them informed and involved in decision-making.

Q47: What is the importance of management representation letters, and how do you use them?

What the interviewer tests: Understanding of audit processes and reliance on management's assertions.

Key elements:
  • Purpose of management representation letters
  • Role in audit evidence
  • Usage in audit procedures

Management representation letters are crucial in auditing as they provide written confirmation from management regarding the accuracy of financial statements. They serve as audit evidence, supporting the auditor's opinion by confirming management's responsibilities and assertions. These letters are used to corroborate information obtained during the audit and to ensure that all relevant disclosures have been made.

Q48: Explain the auditor’s responsibility for reporting fraud as per Companies Act, 2013.

What the interviewer tests: Understanding of legal responsibilities and procedures for auditors.

Key elements:
  • Legal obligation
  • Fraud detection
  • Reporting process

Under the Companies Act, 2013, an auditor is required to report any fraud involving amounts exceeding the prescribed limit to the Central Government within 60 days. The auditor must also report the fraud to the company's audit committee or board of directors immediately. This ensures that significant fraudulent activities are promptly addressed and mitigated.

Q49: How do you review board minutes and identify key matters affecting the audit?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer is assessing your ability to extract relevant information from board minutes and understand its impact on auditing.

Key elements:
  • Understanding board meeting context
  • Identifying significant decisions
  • Assessing audit impact

When reviewing board minutes, I focus on sections discussing financial performance, strategic decisions, and risk management. I identify any resolutions or discussions that could impact financial statements or internal controls. This helps in assessing areas that may require further audit attention.

Q50: How do you evaluate the adequacy and completeness of financial statement disclosures?

What the interviewer tests: The interviewer wants to understand your ability to ensure transparency and compliance in financial reporting.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of regulations
  • Analytical skills
  • Attention to detail

I evaluate the adequacy and completeness of financial statement disclosures by cross-referencing them with regulatory requirements, such as GAAP or IFRS. I analyze the statements to ensure all necessary information is disclosed and pay close attention to any inconsistencies or omissions. This process ensures transparency and compliance.

Q51: How do you deal with disagreements with management over accounting policies or disclosure issues?

What the interviewer tests: Ability to handle conflicts and apply accounting principles.

Key elements:
  • Understanding of accounting policies
  • Communication skills
  • Resolution approach

When disagreements arise over accounting policies, I first ensure I thoroughly understand the issue and the applicable accounting standards. I then present a well-reasoned argument to management, supported by relevant guidelines and examples. Open communication is key, so I encourage a collaborative discussion to find a mutually acceptable solution that upholds our financial integrity and complies with regulations.

Statutory Audit Interview Q&A — Interview Q&A · CandiMentor